Skip to main content
· 10/2/1985

MacHinery Corporation of America v. Gullfiber Ab, Gullfiber International and Marvin Schneider

Citations

  • 774 F.2d 467
  • 227 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 368
  • 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 15286

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • emphasizing that fee awards in patent cases should be limited to exceptional circumstances and require careful consideration of all relevant factors
  • opining that the Court may assess fees under Section 285 against the agent of a disclosed principal, even if he is a non-party to the patent claims, when that agent is responsible for the predicate acts rendering the case exceptional
  • opining that the Court may assess fees under § 285 against the agent of a disclosed principal, even if he is a non-party to the patent claims, when that agent is responsible for the predicate acts rendering the case exceptional
  • “The gross negligence standard has been defined as requiring willful, wanton, or reckless misconduct, or evidence of ‘utter lack of all care.’”
  • “The gross negligence standard has been defined as requiring willful, wanton, or reckless misconduct, or evidence of utter lack of all care” (internal citation omitted)
  • “only after the prevailing party has established the exceptional nature of the case by clear and convincing evidence should the district court decide whether or not to make the award [of attorney fees].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis, Kashiwa, Newman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.