MacHie v. Rosenberg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that defendant must show “(1) the prosecutor’s remarks or conduct were improper and (2
• noting that defendant must show “(1) the prosecutor’s remarks or conduct were improper and (2
• noting that, to prevail on prosecutorial misconduct claim, defendant must show “(1) the prosecutor’s remarks or conduct were improper and (2) that such remarks or conduct prejudicially affected [the defendant’s] substantial rights” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• noting that, to prevail on prosecutorial misconduct claim, defendant must show “(1) the prosecutor’s remarks or conduct were improper and (2) that such remarks or conduct prejudicially affected [the defendant’s] substantial rights” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “As an initial matter, Bruton does not apply here because the Confrontation Clause is only implicated in the context of testimonial statements.”
• where a crime qualifies as a “crime of violence” under the force clause of § 924(c)(3)(B), and not the residual clause of § 924(c)(3)(B

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).