Macheca v. Avegno

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that searches of expanded scope suggested a “‘stronger . . . basis for accepting the integrity of the search’”
• acknowledging that generally, “the agency does not carry the burden of proving that each withheld document was not adopted formally or informally” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• noting that a declaration in a FOIA case must “provide the requisite averment that all locations likely to contain responsive records were searched” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “[F]actual information which does not bear on the policy formulation is not subject to the deliberative-process privilege.”
• exemption permissibly raised in agency’s reply brief

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).