MacHal, Inc. v. Jena Band of Choctaw Indians

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a “settlement agreement,” which expressly purported not to be a “gaming agreement,” was in fact a management contract insofar as it allocated management authority in regards to a casino
• holding that one of the agreements at issue was a management contract, in part, because it required the tribe to repay from gaming revenues the loans it received from plaintiff for construction of the casino and other costs
• holding that a “settlement agreement,” which expressly purported not to be a “gaming agreement,” was in fact a management contract insofar as it allocated management authority in regards to a casino
• finding a series of agreements to be management contracts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).