MacHado v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the trial court properly admitted a hearsay account of statements made to a friend’s son, where the declarant had no reason to fear capture at the time
• finding a non-testifying accomplice’s statement to be admissible as against penal interest where the corroborating circumstances indicated the statement had particularized guarantees of trustworthiness

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Masaka v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-04-01· cited 27×
• Arguelles v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-03-19· cited 10×
• Dewolfe v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-05-23· cited 6×
• Lucien D. Dort v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-08-26· cited 2×
• ANTHONY MOSCATIELLO v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-06-06· cited 1×
• Alden Mitchell Howard v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-10-02· cited 1×
• Arguelles v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-06-27· cited 1×
• SHERARD ADAMS v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-07-24

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Lilly v. Virginia
  Supreme Court· 1999-06-14· cited 1,183×
• Grossman v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1988-02-18· cited 151×
• Franqui v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1997-06-26· cited 102×
• Brooks v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2001-04-05· cited 49×
• Smith v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-12-01· cited 8×