Skip to main content
· 4/18/1997

MacGregor v. Rich

Citations

  • 941 S.W.2d 74
  • 1997 WL 37696

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that we review a dismissal for want of prosecution under a clear abuse of discretion standard and the central issue is whether the plaintiffs exercised reasonable diligence
  • examining whether trial court's motion to dismiss was without reference to any guiding rules and principles, or whether the act was arbitrary or unreasonable
  • finding no abuse of discretion in dismissing suit where plaintiffs failed to notify defendants of separate bankruptcy proceedings
  • refusing to find abuse of discretion where trial court outlined basis for decision in dismissal order and considered evidence and argument at motion to reinstate
  • refusing to find abuse of discretion where trial court outlined basis for decision in dismissal order and considered evidence and argument at motion to reinstate
  • affirming dismissal for want of prosecution where plaintiffs attributed delay, in part, to bankruptcy proceedings but offered no evidence that the proceedings interfered with suit’s prosecution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.