· 1/29/1970
MacGibbon v. Board of Appeals of Duxbury
Citations
- 255 N.E.2d 347
- 356 Mass. 635
- 1 ERC (BNA) 1122
- 1970 Mass. LEXIS 901
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- decision of board “cannot be disturbed unless it is based on a legally untenable ground, or is unreasonable, whimsical, capricious or arbitrary”
- board did not provide an adequate statement of its reasons for denying the special permit and committed numerous errors of law in the process
- board did not provide an adequate statement of its reasons for denying the special permit and committed numerous errors of law in the process
- board of appeals could not adopt interpretation of by-law where its plain language provided \no basis for such an interpretation\
- board of appeals could not adopt interpretation of by- law where its plain language provided \no basis for such an interpretation\
- a court “must affirm the board’s decision unless it finds that denial of the application was ‘based on a legally untenable ground, or [was] unreasonable, whimsical, capricious or arbitrary’ ”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Geogan, Wilkins, Spalding, Cutter, Spiegel, Quirico
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.