Skip to main content
· 1/29/1970

MacGibbon v. Board of Appeals of Duxbury

Citations

  • 255 N.E.2d 347
  • 356 Mass. 635
  • 1 ERC (BNA) 1122
  • 1970 Mass. LEXIS 901

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • decision of board “cannot be disturbed unless it is based on a legally untenable ground, or is unreasonable, whimsical, capricious or arbitrary”
  • board did not provide an adequate statement of its reasons for denying the special permit and committed numerous errors of law in the process
  • board did not provide an adequate statement of its reasons for denying the special permit and committed numerous errors of law in the process
  • board of appeals could not adopt interpretation of by-law where its plain language provided \no basis for such an interpretation\
  • board of appeals could not adopt interpretation of by- law where its plain language provided \no basis for such an interpretation\
  • a court “must affirm the board’s decision unless it finds that denial of the application was ‘based on a legally untenable ground, or [was] unreasonable, whimsical, capricious or arbitrary’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Geogan, Wilkins, Spalding, Cutter, Spiegel, Quirico

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.