Skip to main content
· 9/5/1888

MacE v. Provident Life Ass'n

Citations

  • 7 S.E. 674
  • 101 N.C. 122

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • sustaining defendant’s motion for a directed verdict in an airplane accident in which the plane provided dual controls thus barring the application of res ipsa loquitur
  • sustaining defendant's motion for a directed verdict in an airplane accident in which the plane provided dual controls thus barring the application of res ipsa loquitur

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.