Supreme Court of Virginia· 10/10/1980
Mace v. Merchants Delivery Moving & Storage
Citations
- 221 Va. 401
- 270 S.E.2d 717
- 1980 Va. LEXIS 257
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that \a change in an attending physician's opinion concerning an employee's ability to resume work\ is sufficient to prove a change in condition
- holding that in the absence of any objective medical evidence of continued physiological abnormality, a physician’s opinion that the employee is able to resume unrestricted work qualifies as a change in condition
- change in condition is not limited to changes in employee’s -3- physical condition, but also allows consideration of change in attending physician’s opinion as to whether employee has ability to resume work
- statute .defined “change in condition” to mean “a change in physical condition of the employee as well as any change in the conditions under which compensation was awarded or terminated which would affect the right to, amount of, or duration of compensation”
- an attending physician’s opinion concerning an employee’s ability to resume work
- with unequivocal medical evidence that the claimant was fully able to return to unrestricted work and the absence of any evidence to the contrary, the commission could only conclude that the claimant was able to return to work, regardless of the placement of the burden of proof
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Greif Companies (GENESCO) v. SipeCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1993-07-06· cited 64×
- Lucero v. Climax Molybdenum Co.Supreme Court of Colorado· 1987-02-09· cited 44×
- Cook v. City of Waynesboro Police DepartmentSupreme Court of Virginia· 1983-03-11· cited 39×
- Amp, Inc. v. RuebushCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1990-05-08· cited 37×
- King's Market v. PorterSupreme Court of Virginia· 1984-06-15· cited 36×
- Arellano v. Pam E. K's Donuts ShopCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1998-02-03· cited 20×
- Whitney v. AGSCO DAKOTASouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1990-04-04· cited 20×
- Ratliff v. Rocco Farm FoodsCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1993-04-13· cited 19×
- Mize v. Rocky Mount Ready Mix, Inc.Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1991-01-29· cited 13×
- The Fingles Co. v. TattersonCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1996-07-09· cited 11×
- Central Virginia Training Center v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1986-04-15· cited 9×
- Avery v. Virginia Retirement SystemCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1999-11-09· cited 3×
- MacE v. MERCHANTS DELIVERY, ETC.Supreme Court of Virginia· 1980-10-10
- Dairymen/Flav-O-Rich, Inc. v. ShafferSupreme Court of Virginia· 1983-03-11
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Allen v. Mottley Construction Co.Supreme Court of Virginia· 1933-06-27· cited 71×
- J. A. Foust Coal Co. v. MesserSupreme Court of Virginia· 1954-03-15· cited 40×
- J. A. Jones Construction Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of Virginia· 1956-09-04· cited 30×
- Boxley v. OnoratoSupreme Court of Virginia· 1978-04-21· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.