MacDonald v. Cottle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[I]t is well settled that the conduct of an attorney who acts within the scope of his or her authority will be imputed to the client.”
• it was error to exclude evidence of the defendant’s original, and subsequently amended, admission that he did not give the plaintiff antibiotics before extracting her tooth; that evidence “directly challenged [the defendant’s] credibility” on a material fact in issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).