Skip to main content
· 9/9/1998

Federal Case

Citations

  • 154 F.3d 1072
  • 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7038
  • 98 Daily Journal DAR 9729
  • 159 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2254
  • 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 21883

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a subcontract’s 24 “general reference to the ‘terms and conditions of Contractor’s labor agreements’” was insufficient 25 for incorporating an MLA in a subcontract
  • referring only to “terms and conditions” 9 of undefined “labor agreements”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.