New Mexico Supreme Court· 1/25/1979
Mac Tyres, Inc. v. Vigil
Citations
- 589 P.2d 1037
- 92 N.M. 446
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that trial court is vested with great discretion in applying Rule 11-403 and its ruling will not be disturbed absent an abuse of that discretion
- stating that “each 18 party is entitled to an instruction on his theory of the case if he has pled it and there 11 1 is evidence” to support the theory
- evidence of the existence of insurance does not violate Rule 11-411 where it is offered for purposes of impeachment or to demonstrate the bias or prejudice of a witness
- evidence of insurance admitted to rebut discrediting effect of prior misleading testimony
- impeachment evidence revealing insurance coverage was admissible
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McManus, Easley, Payne, Sosa, Federici
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Woolwine v. Furr's, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1987-10-20· cited 300×
- State v. ChamberlainNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1991-09-25· cited 135×
- State v. SparksNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1985-01-15· cited 94×
- Enriquez v. CochranNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1998-07-30· cited 61×
- City of Santa Fe v. KomisNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1992-08-26· cited 45×
- Couch v. Astec Industries, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2002-06-19· cited 44×
- Grammer v. Kohlhaas Tank & Equipment Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1979-11-27· cited 41×
- Davila Ex Rel. Taylor v. BodelsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1985-07-02· cited 36×
- Behrmann v. Phototron Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court· 1990-07-18· cited 31×
- McCarson Ex Rel. Estate of McCarson v. ForemanNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1984-12-04· cited 28×
- Sutherlin Ex Rel. Estate of Sutherlin v. FenengaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1991-01-24· cited 28×
- Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.New Mexico Supreme Court· 1984-04-10· cited 28×
- Boudar v. E.G. & G., Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court· 1987-08-27· cited 28×
- State v. LaraNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1990-06-26· cited 27×
- Cardoza v. Town of Silver CityNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1981-03-19· cited 25×
- Martinez v. TeagueNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1981-04-02· cited 22×
- Sena v. New Mexico State PoliceNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1995-01-11· cited 20×
- State Ex Rel. State Highway Department v. StrosniderNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1987-11-05· cited 19×
- Gutierrez v. Kent Nowlin Construction Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1981-09-29· cited 10×
- McNeely v. HenryNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1984-02-09· cited 10×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Lucero Ex Rel. Lucero v. TorresNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1960-04-04· cited 69×
- Fort v. NealNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1968-09-09· cited 34×
- Anderson v. WelshNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1974-10-16· cited 34×
- Trujillo v. ChavezNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1966-08-29· cited 34×
- Falkner v. MartinNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1964-01-13· cited 27×
- Selgado v. Commercial Warehouse CompanyNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1974-08-21· cited 27×
- Phillips v. SmithNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1974-06-26· cited 24×
- Wood Ex Rel. Wood v. DwyerNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1973-10-17· cited 15×
- Williams v. CobbNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1977-05-24· cited 13×
- Valley Utilities, Inc. v. O'HARENew Mexico Supreme Court· 1976-06-03· cited 12×
- O'HARE v. Valley Utilities, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1976-02-18· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.