Mabry v. Neighborhood Defender Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that in the absence of allegations of “preferential treatment given to similarly situated [younger] individuals . . . dismissal at the pleading stage is warranted”
• dismissing claims against executive director of organization, brought under ADEA and other federal anti-discrimination statutes, because those statutes did not provide for individual liability
• dismissing ADA claim because complaint alleged “no facts tending to show that [plaintiffs] medical condition limits, let alone substantially limits,” any major life activity
• dismissing ADA claim because complaint alleged “no facts tending to show that [plaintiff’s] medical condition limits, let alone substantially limits,” any major life activity
• being kept “out of the organization’s ‘information loop’ . . . [is] insufficient, by itself, to constitute retaliation” (gathering cases)
• dismissing ADA claim because complaint alleged “no facts tending to show that [plaintiff’s] medical condition limits, let alone substantially limits,” any major life activity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).