Mabee v. Martin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• opining that “[ijnadvertence or mistake of counsel, including that attributable to office staff, does not constitute excusable neglect under this standard”
• affirming the denial of a 30-day extension to an appeal deadline, and holding that the clerk’s failure to notify counsel of the entry of a final judgment was not a basis for finding excusable neglect
• failure of court clerk to notify parties that final order was entered does not extend the time for filing of notice of appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).