Mabary v. Dollarhide

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that applying a subjective standard of contract interpretation would accomplish nothing more than the restatement of the parties’ conflicting positions
• “The language of a contract is ambiguous if the parties to the contract could reasonably disagree as to the meaning of that language.”
• “The language of a contract is ambiguous if the parties to the contract could reasonably disagree as to the meaning of that language.”
• “A lease is interpreted to reflect the parties’ intentions at the time of contracting.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).