Mabank Bank v. Grisham (In Re Grisham)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that absent a written trust agreement, or proof of a trust relationship, a bank had a debtor/creditor relationship only, and section 523(a)(4) of the Code was inapplicable
• finding that the use of proceeds to keep a business afloat was not a willful and malicious injury, while unaccounted-for use was willful and malicious
• finding the requisite intent to harm the bank's security interest by selling the bank's collateral without the bank's written consent or payment of the proceeds to the bank constituted conversion, resulting in a denial of the discharge under § 523(a)(6)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).