· 4/23/1909
Maass v. Rosenthal
Citations
- 116 N.Y.S. 1140
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The central question in this analysis is not whether counsel’s conduct deviated from best practices or most common custom, but instead, whether an attorney’s representation amounted to incompetence under prevailing professional norms.”
- “The central question in this analysis is not whether counsel’s conduct deviated from best practices or most common custom, but instead, whether an attorney’s representation amounted to incompetence under prevailing professional norms.”
- “The central question in this analysis is not whether counsel’s conduct deviated from best practices or most common custom, but instead, whether an attorney’s representation amounted to incompetence under prevailing professional norms.”
- “The central question in this analysis is not whether counsel’s conduct deviated from best practices or most common custom, but instead, whether an attorney’s representation amounted to incompetence under prevailing professional norms.”
- “The central question in this analysis is not whether counsel’s conduct deviated from best practices or most common custom, but instead, whether an attorney’s representation amounted to incompetence under prevailing professional norms.”
- “The central question in this analysis is not whether counsel’s conduct deviated from best practices or most common custom, but instead, whether an attorney’s representation amounted to incompetence under prevailing professional norms.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.