Maasen v. Shaw

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that only the servient -13- estate holder has the right to park in an easement for ingress and egress and then only to the extent that the parking does not interfere with the dominant estate’s rights
• “placing an obstruction on the land ... is a difference in quality of use”
• “By definition, an easement is ‘the mere right of a person to use for a definite purpose another [person]’s land in connection with his [or her] own land.’” (quoting Mahnken v. Gillespie, 43 S.W.2d 797, 800-01 (Mo. 1931))
• “By definition, an easement is ‘the mere right of a person to use for a definite purpose another [person]’s land in connection with his [or her] own land.’” (quoting Mahnken v. Gillespie, 43 S.W.2d 797, 800-01 (Mo. 1931))
• standard of review for declaratory judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).