Maarten v. Cohanzad

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that member of putative class was entitled to intervene to appeal denial of class certification after trial court rendered final judgment incorporating named plaintiffs’ settlement with defendant
• holding that a motion to intervene, filed after final judgment, should have been granted
• holding that a litigant cannot claim “unfair[ ] prejudice[ ]” when one person takes over an appeal from another
• holding that a litigant cannot claim “unfair[] prejudice[ ]” when one person takes over an appeal from another
• holding that a litigant cannot claim “unfair[ ] prejudice[ ]” when one person takes over an appeal from another
• holding that a motion to intervene on appeal was timely when the defendant declined to seek certiorari or rehearing en banc

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).