Ma v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \The appealability of routine interlocutory injunctive orders raised few questions. See George v. Victor Co.
• 'The proper method of calculating child support is a question of law, which we review de novo, adopting the rule of law that is most persuasive in light of precedent, reason, and policy.\ (citing Spott v. Spott
• finding that plaintiff’s claims for conversion and breach of fiduciary duty were preempted by the U.C.C.
• holding Article 4-A preempted claims that were “at their core, assertions that [plaintiff] did not order or approve any of the disputed electronic transfers of funds from his accounts”
• asserting that the one-year statute of limitations “creates an affirmative defense where plaintiff failed to bring suit within a specified period' of time after his cause of action accrued,' often subject to tolling principles”
• applying a substantially identical provision of the UCC’s Article 4A adopted by the New York Legislature

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).