Skip to main content
· 4/9/2001

M & T Electrical Contractors, Inc. v. Capital Lighting & Supply, Inc. (In Re M & T Electrical Contractors, Inc.)

Citations

  • 267 B.R. 434
  • 2001 Bankr. LEXIS 450
  • 2001 WL 1134893

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • denying a third-tier subcontractor’s summary judgment motion to preference count because there was a dispute as to whether the second-tier subcontractor agreed to a mechanism by which a first-tier subcontractor would pay the third-tier subcontractor by joint check

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Teel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.