Skip to main content
· 12/31/1987

M & R Inv. Co., Inc. v. Mandarino

Citations

  • 748 P.2d 488
  • 103 Nev. 711
  • 1987 Nev. LEXIS 1895

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the defendant was entitled to judgment notwithstanding the verdict where the communications at issue were between two employees

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.