M. Pam Davis v. University of North Carolina, at Wilmington Robert E. Tyndall, ph.d.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining in dicta that in the context of academic eligibility requirements and disability challenges, this court “generally accord[s] great deference to a school’s determination of the qualifications of a hopeful student”
• “[T]he Medical School identified professionalism as a fundamental goal of its educational program, and it required that students demonstrate professional behavior and attitudes prior to graduating.”
• “[T]he Medical School identified professionalism as a fundamental goal of its educational program, and it required that students demonstrate professional behavior and attitudes prior to graduating.”
• “[A] person is ‘regarded as’ disabled within the meaning of the ADA if a covered entity mistakenly believes that the person’s actual, nonlimit-ing impairment substantially limits one or more major life activities.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).