M. Mirzoeff, Inc. v. Foster & Chadwick Fur Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that if the finder of fact decides against the challenging party on the existence and validity of a subsequent will, then no further inquiry is required
• “But although a will must be proved regularly by two witnesses, yet circumstances may supply the want of one witness, when they go directly to the immediate act of disposition”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).