Skip to main content
· 9/2/1981

M & M Transportation Co. v. Schuster Express, Inc. (In Re M & M Transportation Co.)

Citations

  • 13 B.R. 861
  • 24 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 489
  • 1981 Bankr. LEXIS 3030

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • In both cases the object of the contract was obtaining ICC operating permits. Loss of market value of the rights because of deregulation, although substantial, did not support frustration and rescission.
  • “The basic test is whether the parties contracted on a basic assumption that a particular contingency would not occur . . . . An analysis of the facts is crucial for the proper application of this doctrine.”
  • operation under interim permit for 18 months

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Roy Babitt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.