· 9/2/1981
M & M Transportation Co. v. Schuster Express, Inc. (In Re M & M Transportation Co.)
Citations
- 13 B.R. 861
- 24 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 489
- 1981 Bankr. LEXIS 3030
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- In both cases the object of the contract was obtaining ICC operating permits. Loss of market value of the rights because of deregulation, although substantial, did not support frustration and rescission.
- “The basic test is whether the parties contracted on a basic assumption that a particular contingency would not occur . . . . An analysis of the facts is crucial for the proper application of this doctrine.”
- operation under interim permit for 18 months
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Roy Babitt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.