M. Janice Ayers-Schaffner v. Joseph R. Distefano

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding a requirement that limited the new election of a school board to those \voters who participated in the original balloting\ to be unconstitutional and \almost inconceivable\
• similar suggestion deemed “hardly worthy of discussion” because right to vote “is of the most fundamental significance under our constitutional structure” [internal quotation marks omitted]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).