M. I. G. Investments, Inc. v. Marsala

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff could not have been surprised that trial court would scrutinize liquidated damages provision prior to enforcement even though the issue of the enforceability of the provision was not raised as an affirmative defense
• holding that plaintiff could not have been surprised that trial court would scrutinize liquidated damages provision prior to enforcement even though the issue of the enforceability of the provision was not raised as an affirmative defense
• no fraud creating successor liability when seller performed on the contract until sale made and remained liable on the contract even after the sale
• partnership sold assets to a business that was apparently a sole proprietorship
• applying general rule and exceptions to noncorporate entity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).