Skip to main content
· 2/27/2006

M. Fatima Guijosa De Sandoval v. U.S. Atty. Gen.

Citations

  • 440 F.3d 1276
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 4937

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • comparing 8 U.S.C. § 1231(a)(5) with its predecessor 8 U.S.C. § 1252(f) (1994)
  • finding no due process viola- tion where petitioner admitted all necessary facts to warrant rein- statement of existing removal order and procedure provided under statute did not afford her an appearance before an IJ
  • “Petitioner fails to show how the additional procedures she demands would have changed the result in her case because she admitted all of the facts necessary to warrant reinstatement of the original 'removal order under § 1231(a)(5
  • “Petitioner fails to show how the additional procedures she demands would have changed the result in her case because she admitted all of the facts necessary to warrant reinstatement of the original removal order under § 1231(a)(5

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Edmondson, Black, Fay

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.