Skip to main content
· 12/2/1997

M & D MASONRY, INC. v. Universal Surety Co.

Citations

  • 572 N.W.2d 408
  • 6 Neb. Ct. App. 215
  • 1997 Neb. App. LEXIS 168

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that defendant’s setoff allegations met statutory requirements because they were separately stated and numbered and were founded on contract
  • explaining generally the common-law doctrines of setoff and recoupment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Miller-Lerman, Severs, Mues

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.