M & D ASSOCIATES v. Mandara

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that, in a A-3182-18T1 5 foreclosure action, Rule 4:50-1 is paramount to statutes governing practice and procedure
• holding that Rule 4:50-1 is paramount
• finding affidavit of inquiry inadequate where search of additional records would have revealed an address for service of the defendant
• explaining a showing of a meritorious defense is not required to vacate a judgment under Rule 4:50-1 where the judgment is void because of defective service of process
• rejecting service by publication where an affidavit of diligent inquiry showed the plaintiff did not search motor A-1586-17T4 10 vehicle or voter registration records, which would have shown defendant resided in-state
• addressing a foreign judgment where there was no service of process

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).