M. Collins v. UCBR

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• public interest group did not have sufficiently direct or personal interest to require intervention because its interest coincided with that of the public
• “[Section] 22a-19 [a] compels a trial court to permit intervention in an administrative proceeding or judicial review of such a proceeding by a party seeldng to raise environmental issues upon the filing of a verified complaint. The statute is therefore not discretionary.”
• \[Section] 22a-19 [a] compels a trial court to permit intervention in an administrative proceeding or judicial review of such a proceeding by a party seeking to raise environmental issues upon the filing of a verified complaint. The statute is therefore not discretionary.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).