M., BETH v. T., SUSAN

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[W]e must next determine whether Hobbs Act robbery is a categorical match with the enumerated offense of extortion.”
• “[W]here the meaning of the statute is ‘plain,’ the defendant need not provide a case to demonstrate a realistic probability that the statute is broader than the generic offense.”
• conceding no match with generic robbery

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).