M. B. Guran Company, Inc. v. City of Akron

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the HUD regulations create neither an express nor implied private right of action
• concluding the HUD regulations create neither an express nor implied private right of action
• finding “no indication of an intent to create a private right of action in 12 U.S.C. § 1701x(c)(5)”
• city violation of competitive bid guidelines contained in a HUD handbook did not give use to an implied right of action cognizable in federal court by the disappointed contractor; case seen “as one which is traditionally relegated to state law”
• city violation of competitive bid guidelines contained in a HUD handbook did not give use to an implied right of action cognizable in federal court by the disappointed contractor; case seen “as one which is traditionally relegated to state law”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).