M. A. B. v. Buell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that, even though the parties separated, the trial court was permitted to conclude the respondent represented a credible threat to petitioner’s physical safety
• concluding that, even though the parties separated, the trial court was permitted to conclude the respondent represented a credible threat to petitioner’s physical safety
• observing that “the two elements are closely related” and that in practice “it is hard to imagine concluding that petitioner is in imminent danger of further abuse from respondent if respondent does not also present a credible threat to her safety”
• con- cluding that, even though the parties separated, the trial court was permitted to conclude the father represented a credible threat to the mother’s physical safety

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• R. M. v. McNeer
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-06-25· cited 6×
• A. J. T. v. Croft
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-05-19· cited 1×
• M. Z. v. Horning
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2026-04-01

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ball v. Gladden
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1968-07-17· cited 849×
• Botofan-Miller v. Miller
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2019-08-15· cited 22×
• M. A. B. v. Buell
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2020-06-18· cited 22×
• Hubbell v. Sanders
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-09-08· cited 15×
• J. K. v. Kargol
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-01-03· cited 15×
• M. A. B. v. Buell
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-03-06· cited 7×
• P. K. W. v. Steagall
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-10-09· cited 4×