Skip to main content

Lytle v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Citations

  • 827 S.W.2d 652
  • 309 Ark. 139
  • 1992 Ark. LEXIS 250

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “We said in Standridge [v. City of Hot Springs, 271 Ark. 754, 610 8 S.W.2d 574 (1981),] that the reason for Rule 50(a
  • “We said in Standridge [v. City of Hot Springs, 271 Ark. 754, 610 8 S.W.2d 574 (1981),] that the reason for Rule 50(a) is to bring specific grounds for the motion to the court’s attention. If the trial court considers those grounds, and others as well, this does not violate the rule.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brown, Dudley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.