Lytle v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We said in Standridge [v. City of Hot Springs, 271 Ark. 754, 610 8 S.W.2d 574 (1981),] that the reason for Rule 50(a
• “We said in Standridge [v. City of Hot Springs, 271 Ark. 754, 610 8 S.W.2d 574 (1981),] that the reason for Rule 50(a) is to bring specific grounds for the motion to the court’s attention. If the trial court considers those grounds, and others as well, this does not violate the rule.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).