Lytle v. Roto Lincoln Mercury & Subaru, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a booklet given to the buyer of a new car did not satisfy the definition of “written warranty” under § 2301(6)
• even if a defendant has effectively disclaimed all implied warranties, a plaintiff may nonetheless have a cause of action on a revocation of acceptance claim, and summary judgment as to same was improper
• where the dealer \issued\ the manufacturer's warranty to the buyer, but took no other steps that could be construed as an adoption of that warranty, it did not adopt the manufacturer's warranty within the meaning of the Magnuson-Moss Act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).