Lytle v. Lytle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the plaintiff did not suffer serious injury despite having pain four years later that sometimes prevented her from making her bed, vacuuming, and bowling
• concluding that the plaintiff’s injuries to her sciatic nerve, back, and neck were not serious considering that her pain was less intense four years later than immediately after the accident and was treated primarily with physical therapy for eleven months
• finding no serious impairment of a bodily function where the plaintiff was precluded from working for less than six months and worked full-time after returning

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).