Lyons v. Lancer Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that case law discusses the MCS-90 and MCS-90B Endorsements interchangeably as they are parallel endorsements
• explaining that Second Circuit and other courts determine whether endorsement applies by looking to nature of specific trip or shipment at issue
• relying on cases interpreting MCS-90 endorsement to determine how to apply MCS-90B endorsement
• “The shipper is the entity that purchases the transportation services of the carrier.” (punctuation omitted)
• “In ruling on a motion for summary judgment, the district court may rely on any material that would be admissible at a trial.” (quotations and citation omitted)
• “In ruling on a motion for summary judgment, the district court may rely on any material that would be admissible at a trial.” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).