Lyon v. Eiseman (In Re Forbes)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “When differing views of the evidence are possible, the bankruptcy court’s findings cannot be clearly erroneous.”
• “The bankruptcy court’s legal conclusion that the transfer at issue constituted an avoidable fraudulent conveyance is reviewed de novo.”
• “When differing views of the evidence are possible, the bankruptcy court’s findings cannot be clearly erroneous.”
• “A bankruptcy court order which sets aside a fraudulent conveyance pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 548(a) is a final order for purposes of appeal.”
• “When differing views of the evidence are possible, the bankruptcy court’s findings cannot be clearly erroneous.”
• “When differing views of the evidence are possible, the bankruptcy court’s findings cannot be clearly erroneous.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).