Lyon Metal Products, L.L.C. v. Protection Mutual Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that damages were not capable of easy calculation when difference between the damages awarded and the damages claimed was 92% of the amount claimed
• explaining that posttrial motion need only indicate the grounds relied upon with sufficient particularity to afford the trial court the identity of the error
• explaining that posttrial motion need only indicate the grounds relied upon with sufficient particularity to afford the trial court the identity of the error
• business interruption insurance “covers a loss of earnings due to a loss of production, not just a loss of production”
• “The large difference between what [the plaintiff] claimed in business interruption loss, what [the defendant] calculated that loss to be, and what the jury ultimately awarded is a strong indication that the sum due *** was not easily determined.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).