Lynteq, Inc. v. The United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that although they are not legally binding, explanatory notes are indicative of the proper interpretation of HTSUS headings
• finding that explanatory notes, though not legally binding, are indicative of the interpretation of HTSUS headings
• classifying Cromophyl-L as a preparation derived from marigold meal, but not as marigold meal itself
• a residual heading covers articles not provided for in an accompanying coordinate eo nomine heading
• “Absent clear legislative intent to the contrary, the plain meaning of the statute will prevail.”
• “Absent clear legislative intent to the contrary, the plain meaning of the statute will prevail.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).