Lynne M. Ammerman v. Robert Sween

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming retention of supplemental jurisdiction over state law claims against employee defendant due to common nucleus of operative facts with remaining federal claims against employer defendant
• noting that, under § 1367(a), “judicial power to hear both state and federal claims exists where the federal claim has sufficient substance to confer subject matter juris- diction on the court, and the state and federal claims derive from a common nucleus of operative facts”
• court had supplemental jurisdiction over state tort claim against co-worker for assault and battery because the relevant facts were a subset of facts supporting the Title VII claim against the employer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).