Skip to main content

Lynn v. State

Citations

  • 860 S.W.2d 599
  • 1993 WL 281999

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that appellant “required the jury to opt between murder, an intentional or knowing act, and acquittal. Such a decision, although risky, is sometimes successful.”
  • holding record showed trial lawyer’s decision not to request instruction on lesser-included offense was strategic decision and that it was not unreasonable despite its high risk
  • requiring a jury to opt between murder and acquittal, although risky, is sometimes successful
  • requiring a jury to opt between murder and acquittal, although risky, is sometimes successful
  • all-or-nothing strategy, although risky, was not so unreasonable under facts of case as to deprive defendant of fair trial when focus of case was on absence of any evidence of intent
  • all-or-nothing strategy, although risky, was not so unreasonable under facts of case as to deprive defendant of fair trial when focus of case was on absence of any evidence of intent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nye, Dorsey, Hinojosa

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.