Lynn v. Flanders

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing summary judgment on the basis that fact questions were presented regarding whether counsel sufficiently apprised his client of the effect of a material term of the transaction and “with respect to [counsel’s] diligence in overseeing the negotiations”
• negligence on the part of the client is “a factor to be assessed in mitigation of damages”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).