· 5/29/2007
Lynn Noyes v. Kelly Services, a Corporation
Citations
- 488 F.3d 1163
- 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 12356
- 89 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,835
- 100 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1153
- 2007 WL 1531824
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that circumstantial evidence of pretext must be specific and substantial
- stating that circumstantial evidence of pretext must be specific and substantial
- finding that 2 district court improperly denied a Rule 16(b) motion to modify the scheduling order where plaintiff 3 diligently pursued discovery but was unable to obtain deposition testimony prior to deadline to file 4 response to summary judgment motion
- “Viewing the evidence in the light most 22 favorable to Noyes, Heinz’s credibility on the issue of why he chose Jilesen was severely 23 undermined by conflicting evidence on the promotion process.”
- finding the “protected class” element inapplicable for reverse religious discrimination claims
- evidence that an 17 employer favored a “more junior, less qualified” employee outside of the protected class supported 18 an inference of discrimination
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hug, McKeown, Moskowitz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.