Lynn Moodie, Cross-Appellee v. School Book Fairs, Inc., a Corporation, Cross-Appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that although a book distributor did not sell goods or use protected marks, its distribution activities qualified it as a dealer under the WFDL
• holding that plaintiffs use of defendant’s trademark on plaintiffs business cards was de minimus and did not meet the dealership requirements of the WFDL
• finding that grantor had dealer over a barrel where dealer invested between approximately $20,000 and $46,000 in grant- or-specific assets
• explaining that the purpose of the WFDL is “to correct a ‘market failure’ by protecting dealers who have made such an investment”
• finding only de minimis investment in the protected marks relevant to that case
• finding only de minimis investment in the protected marks relevant to that case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).