Lynge v. Kunstmann

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[i]t has been held that questions of intent are particularly inappropriate for summary judgment”
• noting that \[i]t has been held that questions of intent are particularly inappropriate for summary judgment\
• “a signature is not always essential to the binding force of an agreement. *** The object of a signature is to show mutuality or assent, but these facts may be shown in other ways, as, for example, by acts or conduct of the parties.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).