Skip to main content
· 5/3/1993

Lynda Peart v. City of New York, New York City Police Department, Raymond Kelly, David Dinkins

Citations

  • 992 F.2d 458
  • 25 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1049
  • 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 10191
  • 61 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,229

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reasoning that “prejudice resulting from unreasonable delay may be presumed as a matter of law”
  • noting that defendants were prejudiced by time and money spent on trial preparation and further delays that would have likely resulted in witnesses being unavailable or in their diminished recollection of events at issue
  • noting that defendants were prejudiced by time and money spent on trial preparation and further delays that would have likely resulted in witnesses being unavailable or in their diminished recollection of events at issue
  • noting that prejudice may be presumed where delay is unreasonable
  • noting that prejudice may be presumed where delay is unreasonable
  • noting that prejudice may be presumed where delay is unreasonable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Meskill, Timbers, Pratt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.