Lynda J. Khan, Cross-Appellee v. Dennis J. Gallitano, Nancy J. Czarnik, Craig B. Johnson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff “failed to show why the right to be free from tortious interference by state actors is a fundamental right deeply rooted in out history and tradition or implicit in the concept of ordered liberty.”
• explaining what must be demonstrated to sustain a Contracts Clause claim and what must be demonstrated for procedural and substantive due pro- cess claims
• fundamental right was not the general or broad right to contract, but the “right to be free from state officials tortiously interfering with one’s existing contractual relationships”
• \There is a significant difference between making a weak argument with little chance of success . . . and making a frivolous argument with no chance of success\
• “The courts have long struggled to identify the appropriate analysis for substantive-due-process claims ..., [b]ut in [ ]Glucks-berg ..., a five-justice majority of the Court agreed on a single analysis.”
• discussing Glucksberg, 521 U.S. at 722

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).