Lynda Fallon v. State of Illinois

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the EPA and Title VII are distinct remedies
• noting “[e]mployers may prefer and reward experience, believing it makes a more valuable employee, for whatever reason”
• comparing male “Veterans Service Officer[s]” with female “Veterans Service Officer Associate[s]”
• “Employers may prefer and reward experience, believing it makes a more valuable employee, for whatever reason.”
• “The fourth affirmative defense . . . is a broad ‘catch-all’ exception and embraces an almost limitless number of factors, so long as they do not involve sex.”
• “It is not our province to second-guess employers’ business judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).